Development and functions of leaf bases in succulents of the genus Curio (Asteraceae)

Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C.



Перейти в оглавление выпуска:
2024. T. 129. Vyp. 4.

Go to the issue table of contents:
2024. T. 129. Vyp. 4.

Данные статьи

Description

DOI

10.55959/MSU0027-1403-BB-2024-129-4-40-50

Авторы:

Authors:

Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C.

Ключевые слова:

Keywords:

Скачать pdf статьи:

Download the article:



Ссылка для цитирования:

For citation:

Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C., Development and functions of leaf bases in succulents of the genus Curio (Asteraceae) // Byul. MOIP. Otd. biol. 2024. T. 129. Vyp. 4. S. 40-50

Development and functions of leaf bases in succulents of the genus Curio (Asteraceae)

The leaf base in dicots, unlike that in monocots, rarely grows into a leaf sheath and it usually remains barely discernible in the definitive leaf. As a result, the leaf base is frequently overlooked when studying the morphogenesis of dicot leaves. The lack of information of the development of leaf bases in dicots with different morphological leaf types hampers comparing the morphogenesis of their leaves with the morphogenesis of monocot leaves of similar morphological types. The theory of two zones which is generally used in studies of monocot leaf morphogenesis is shown to be quite applicable to the morphogenesis of unifacial, subunifacial, and bifacial leaves of members of the genus Curio (Asteraceae). However, in the investigated species of Curio, these two zones become clearly discernible only after the leaf has begun to grow intercalary. The leaf bases in these species are shown to be quite similar with monocot leaf bases in their protective function as they sheath the younger growing leaves in the bud. The lateral growth of the leaf base to result in spanning a large part of the stem circumference is concluded to be a xeromorphic trait of Curio species. The leaf bases in two species develop adaxial depressions to embrace the younger growing leaves to better protect them.

References

Barykina R.P., Veselova T.D., Devyatov A.G., Dzhalilova Kh.Kh., Il’ina G.M., Chubatova N.V. Spravochnik po botanicheskoi mikrotekhnike. Osnovy i metody. M., 2004. 312 s
Structure, origin and evolution of the terete leaves in Rowleyani C. Jeffrey section of Senecio L. genus (Asteraceae). Biology Bulletin. 1993. № 3. P. 393–401
Agrwal D.K., Saxena N.P. Anatomy of ochrea and stipule in Polygonaceae. The Journal of Indian Botanical Society. 2012. Vol. 91. I. 4. P. 299–309.
Bharathan G. Does the monocot mode of leaf development characterize all monocots? Aliso: A journal of systematic and evolutionary botany. 1995. Vol. 14. I.4. P. 271–279.
Bower F.O. On the comparative morphology of the leaf in the vascular cryptogams and gymnosperms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 1884. Vol. 175. P. 565–61
Brandbyge J. Polygonaceae / Kubitzki K., Rohwer J.G., Bittrich V. (eds) Flowering plants · dicotyledons. the families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Springer. Berlin. Heidelberg. 1993 (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-66202899-5_63).
Cheng J., Yao X., Li X., Yue L., Duan X., Li B., Fu X., Li S., Shan H., Yin X., Whitewoods C., Coen E., Kong H. Diversification of ranunculaceous petals in shape supports a generalized model for plant lateral organ morphogenesis and evolution. Science Advances. 2023. Т. 9. N 16 (DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adf8049).
Conklin P.A., Strable J., Li S. and Scanlon M.J. On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves. New Phytol. 2019. Vol. 221. P. 706–724.
Cornwall J., Stubbs C.J., McMahan C.S., Robertson D.J. The overlooked biomechanical role of the clasping leaf sheath in wheat stalk lodging. Front. Plant Sci. 2021. Vol. 12 (DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.617880).
De Candolle A.P. Organographie végétale. 2 vols. Germier Bailliere, Paris, 1827.
Eichler A.W. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Blattes mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nebenblattbildungen. (Inaug. Diss.) Marburg, 1861. P. 1–60.
Endress P.K. The whole and the parts: relationships between f l oral architecture and fl oral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils // Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 2008. Vol. 95. I. 1. P. 101–120.
Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C. Leaf development in Curio articulatus (L. f.) P.V.Heath (Asteraceae – Senecioneae). Wulfenia, 2016. Vol. 23. P. 135–146 (DOI: 10.3417/2006190).
Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C. Development of the leaf forerunner tip (Vorläuferspitze) in Curio affinities (Asteraceae: Senecioneae), a structure unique to dicots // Botanica Pacifica. 2023. Vol. 12. I. 1. P. 39–46 (DOI: 10.17581/bp.2023.12116).
Hagemann W. Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Angiospermenblatter // Bot. Jb. 1970. Vol. 90. P. 297–413.
Hillson C.J. Leaf development in Senecio rowleyanus (Compositae) // Amer. J. Bot. 1979. Vol. 66. I. 1. P. 59–63.
Jernstedt J.A., Cutter E.G., Gifford E.M., Lu P. Angle meristem origin and development in Selaginella martensii. Annals of Botany. 1992. Vol. 69. I. 4. P. 351–363 (DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088352).
Johnston, R., Leiboff, S. and Scanlon, M.J. Ontogeny of the sheathing leaf base in maize (Zea mays). New Phytol. 2015. Vol. 205. P. 306–315 (DOI: 10.1111/nph.13010).
Kaplan D.R. Comparative foliar histogenesis in Acorus calamus and its bearing on the phyllode theory of monocotyledonous leaves // Amer. J. Bot. 1970. Vol. 57. P. 331–361 (DOI: 10.2307/2485311).
Kaplan D.R. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the monocotyledons // Quart. Rev. Biol. 1973. Vol. 48. N 3. P. 437–457.
Mitra G.C., Majumdar G.P. The leaf-base and the Internode – their true morphology. Journal of Palaeosciences. 1952. Vol. 1. P. 351–367 (DOI: 10.54991/jop.1952.416).
Niklas K.J. The mechanical significance of clasping leaf sheaths in grasses: evidence from two cultivars of Avena sativa // Annals of Botany. 1990. Vol. 65. I. 5. P. 505–512 (DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087962).
Ozerova L.V. and Timonin A.C. On the evidence of subunifacial and unifacial leaves: Developmental studies in leaf-succulent Senecio L. species (Asteraceae). Wulfenia, 2009. Vol. 16. P. 61–77.
Ozerova L.V. and Timonin A.C. Development of ensiform leaves in Senecio crassissimus Humber and Curio ficoides (L.) P.V. Heath (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). Wulfenia, 2021. Vol. 28. P. 23–28.
Rudall P.J. Comparative leaf morphogenesis in Iridaceae. Botanische Jahrbücher. 1990. Vol. 112. I. 2. P. 241–260.
Rudall P.J., Buzgo M. Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf / Developmental genetics and plant evolution (Ed. Q.C.B. Cronk, R.M. Bateman, J.A. Hawkins). L., 2002. P. 431–458.
Ruzin, S.E. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. New York, 1999. 322 p.
Sattler R. Classical morphology and continuum morphology: opposition and continuum. Annals of Botany. 1996. Vol. 78. P. 577–581 (DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0163).
Tillich H.-J. Development and organization / K. Kubitzki, ed. Flowering plants: Monocotyledons. The families and genera of vascular plants. Berlin. Heidelberg. 1998. P. 1–19.
Timonin A.C., Ozerova L.V., Remizowa M.V. Development of unifacial leaves in Senecio s. lat. (Asteraceae). Wulfenia, 2006. Vol. 13. P. 217–227.
Tomlinson P.B. The leaf base in palms, its morphology and mechanical biology. J. Arnold Arboretum. 1962. Vol. 43. I. 1. P. 23–50.
Troll W. Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanzen. Band 1. Vegetationsorgane. Teil 2. Berlin, 1939.
Xu Z., Chang L. Apiaceae or Umbelliferae / Identification and control of common weeds. Vol. 3. Springer, Singapore. 2017.

Список литературы

Barykina R.P., Veselova T.D., Devyatov A.G., Dzhalilova Kh.Kh., Il’ina G.M., Chubatova N.V. Spravochnik po botanicheskoi mikrotekhnike. Osnovy i metody. M., 2004. 312 s
Structure, origin and evolution of the terete leaves in Rowleyani C. Jeffrey section of Senecio L. genus (Asteraceae). Biology Bulletin. 1993. № 3. P. 393–401
Agrwal D.K., Saxena N.P. Anatomy of ochrea and stipule in Polygonaceae. The Journal of Indian Botanical Society. 2012. Vol. 91. I. 4. P. 299–309.
Bharathan G. Does the monocot mode of leaf development characterize all monocots? Aliso: A journal of systematic and evolutionary botany. 1995. Vol. 14. I.4. P. 271–279.
Bower F.O. On the comparative morphology of the leaf in the vascular cryptogams and gymnosperms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 1884. Vol. 175. P. 565–61
Brandbyge J. Polygonaceae / Kubitzki K., Rohwer J.G., Bittrich V. (eds) Flowering plants · dicotyledons. the families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Springer. Berlin. Heidelberg. 1993 (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-66202899-5_63).
Cheng J., Yao X., Li X., Yue L., Duan X., Li B., Fu X., Li S., Shan H., Yin X., Whitewoods C., Coen E., Kong H. Diversification of ranunculaceous petals in shape supports a generalized model for plant lateral organ morphogenesis and evolution. Science Advances. 2023. Т. 9. N 16 (DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adf8049).
Conklin P.A., Strable J., Li S. and Scanlon M.J. On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves. New Phytol. 2019. Vol. 221. P. 706–724.
Cornwall J., Stubbs C.J., McMahan C.S., Robertson D.J. The overlooked biomechanical role of the clasping leaf sheath in wheat stalk lodging. Front. Plant Sci. 2021. Vol. 12 (DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.617880).
De Candolle A.P. Organographie végétale. 2 vols. Germier Bailliere, Paris, 1827.
Eichler A.W. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Blattes mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nebenblattbildungen. (Inaug. Diss.) Marburg, 1861. P. 1–60.
Endress P.K. The whole and the parts: relationships between f l oral architecture and fl oral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils // Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 2008. Vol. 95. I. 1. P. 101–120.
Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C. Leaf development in Curio articulatus (L. f.) P.V.Heath (Asteraceae – Senecioneae). Wulfenia, 2016. Vol. 23. P. 135–146 (DOI: 10.3417/2006190).
Fedotov A.P., Ozerova L.V., Timonin A.C. Development of the leaf forerunner tip (Vorläuferspitze) in Curio affinities (Asteraceae: Senecioneae), a structure unique to dicots // Botanica Pacifica. 2023. Vol. 12. I. 1. P. 39–46 (DOI: 10.17581/bp.2023.12116).
Hagemann W. Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Angiospermenblatter // Bot. Jb. 1970. Vol. 90. P. 297–413.
Hillson C.J. Leaf development in Senecio rowleyanus (Compositae) // Amer. J. Bot. 1979. Vol. 66. I. 1. P. 59–63.
Jernstedt J.A., Cutter E.G., Gifford E.M., Lu P. Angle meristem origin and development in Selaginella martensii. Annals of Botany. 1992. Vol. 69. I. 4. P. 351–363 (DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088352).
Johnston, R., Leiboff, S. and Scanlon, M.J. Ontogeny of the sheathing leaf base in maize (Zea mays). New Phytol. 2015. Vol. 205. P. 306–315 (DOI: 10.1111/nph.13010).
Kaplan D.R. Comparative foliar histogenesis in Acorus calamus and its bearing on the phyllode theory of monocotyledonous leaves // Amer. J. Bot. 1970. Vol. 57. P. 331–361 (DOI: 10.2307/2485311).
Kaplan D.R. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the monocotyledons // Quart. Rev. Biol. 1973. Vol. 48. N 3. P. 437–457.
Mitra G.C., Majumdar G.P. The leaf-base and the Internode – their true morphology. Journal of Palaeosciences. 1952. Vol. 1. P. 351–367 (DOI: 10.54991/jop.1952.416).
Niklas K.J. The mechanical significance of clasping leaf sheaths in grasses: evidence from two cultivars of Avena sativa // Annals of Botany. 1990. Vol. 65. I. 5. P. 505–512 (DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087962).
Ozerova L.V. and Timonin A.C. On the evidence of subunifacial and unifacial leaves: Developmental studies in leaf-succulent Senecio L. species (Asteraceae). Wulfenia, 2009. Vol. 16. P. 61–77.
Ozerova L.V. and Timonin A.C. Development of ensiform leaves in Senecio crassissimus Humber and Curio ficoides (L.) P.V. Heath (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). Wulfenia, 2021. Vol. 28. P. 23–28.
Rudall P.J. Comparative leaf morphogenesis in Iridaceae. Botanische Jahrbücher. 1990. Vol. 112. I. 2. P. 241–260.
Rudall P.J., Buzgo M. Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf / Developmental genetics and plant evolution (Ed. Q.C.B. Cronk, R.M. Bateman, J.A. Hawkins). L., 2002. P. 431–458.
Ruzin, S.E. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. New York, 1999. 322 p.
Sattler R. Classical morphology and continuum morphology: opposition and continuum. Annals of Botany. 1996. Vol. 78. P. 577–581 (DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0163).
Tillich H.-J. Development and organization / K. Kubitzki, ed. Flowering plants: Monocotyledons. The families and genera of vascular plants. Berlin. Heidelberg. 1998. P. 1–19.
Timonin A.C., Ozerova L.V., Remizowa M.V. Development of unifacial leaves in Senecio s. lat. (Asteraceae). Wulfenia, 2006. Vol. 13. P. 217–227.
Tomlinson P.B. The leaf base in palms, its morphology and mechanical biology. J. Arnold Arboretum. 1962. Vol. 43. I. 1. P. 23–50.
Troll W. Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanzen. Band 1. Vegetationsorgane. Teil 2. Berlin, 1939.
Xu Z., Chang L. Apiaceae or Umbelliferae / Identification and control of common weeds. Vol. 3. Springer, Singapore. 2017.