Monorhythmic systems of shoots in conifers

Matyukhin D.L.



Перейти в оглавление выпуска:
2024. T. 129. Vyp. 4.

Go to the issue table of contents:
2024. T. 129. Vyp. 4.

Данные статьи

Description

DOI

10.55959/MSU0027-1403-BB-2024-129-4-63-76

Авторы:

Authors:

Matyukhin D.L.

Ключевые слова:

Keywords:

сoniferous, branch, shoot systems, growth, sillepsis, accretions, branching, buds open and closed

Скачать pdf статьи:

Download the article:



Ссылка для цитирования:

For citation:

Matyukhin D.L., Monorhythmic systems of shoots in conifers // Byul. MOIP. Otd. biol. 2024. T. 129. Vyp. 4. S. 63-76

Monorhythmic systems of shoots in conifers

Shoot systems forming within one period of growth outside the bud, have been studied using collections of conifers in Russian botanic gardens. For the 42 genera of contemporary Pinopsida, different structure types with varying position of lateral buds or shoots, the ratio of the length of the lateral shoot and the overlying part of the maternal one, the order of branching of silleptic shoots, the presence or absence of various specialized vegetative shoots is considered. To denote such systems, the term “monorhythmic system of shoots” is proposed. The variety of shoot systems formed from closed or open buds during the post-bud growth phase in Pinopsida representatives is characterized; the degree of branching in such systems, differentiation of shoots within them depending on the order of branching and functional specialization is shown. The structural diversity of lateral sylleptic shoots associated with an increase in photosynthetic surface and growth processes has been established. Polymorphism of systems is described. The number of monorhythmic systems of shoots (MSS) within a genus can vary from 3 to 9. For each genus, there is a limited number of variants that are similar within families. The greatest variety of structural variants of monorhythmic systems of shoots is characteristic to the Cupressaceae family. Sylleptically branched monorhythmic systems of shoots are characteristic to plants living in frost-free climates. Genera from areas with severe winters are characterized by non-branching or limited branching ones.

References

Antonova I.S., Azova O.V. Arkhitekturnye modeli krony drevesnykh rastenii // Bot. zhurn. 1999. T. 84. № 3. S. 10–32
Gatsuk L.E. Gemmaksilyarnye rasteniya i sistema sopodchinennykh edinits ikh pobegovogo tela // Byul. MOIP. Otd. Biol. 1974. T. 79. Vyp. 1. S. 100–113
Gatsuk L.E. Ierarkhicheskaya sistema strukturno-biologicheskikh edinits rastitel’nogo organizma, vydelennykh na makromorfologicheskom urovne // Uspekhi ekologicheskoi morfologii rastenii i ee vliyanie na smezhnye nauki. 1994. M., S. 18–19
Gatsuk L.E. Rastitel’nyi organizm: opyt postroeniya ierarkhicheskoi sistemy ego strukturno-biologicheskikh edinits. // «Sovremennye podkhody k opisaniyu struktury rastenii». 2008. Kirov. S. 26–47
Goroshkevich S.N. Struktura i razvitie elementarnogo pobega kedra sibirskogo // Vestn. Tomskogo gos. universiteta. Biol. 2014. T. 28. № 4. S. 37–55
Grudzinskaya I.A. Letnee pobegoobrazovanie u drevesnykh rastenii i ego klassifi katsiya. // Bot. zhurn. 1960. T. 45. № 7. S. 968–978
Kuznetsova T.V. K istorii razvitiya predstavlenii o plane stroeniya pobega sosudistykh rastenii i o meste filloma v nem // Bot. zhurn. 1995. T. 80. № 7. S. 1–11
Matyukhin D.L. Tipologiya vegetativnykh pobegov v klasse Pinopsida. // Izvestiya TSKhA. 2010. № 5. S. 46–56
Matyukhin, D.L. Sistemy elementarnykh monoritmicheskikh pobegov u khvoinykh. // Izvestiya TSKhA. 2012. № 1. S. 142–152
Meyen S.V. Gipoteza proiskhozhdeniya pokrytosemennykh ot bennettitov putem gamogeterotopii (perenosa priznakov s odnogo pola na drugoi). // Zhurn. obshch. biol. 1986. T. 47. № 3. S. 291–309
Meyen S.V. Osnovy paleobotaniki. M., 1987. 380 s
Mikhalevskaya O.B. Struktura i razvitie bokovykh sillepticheskikh pobegov u drevesnykh rastenii i predstavlenie ob elementarnom pobege. // «Aktual’nye voprosy ekologicheskoi morfologii rastenii». M., 1995. S. 70–76
Serebryakov I.G. Morfologiya vegetativnykh organov vysshikh rastenii. M., 1952. 391 s
Serebryakov I.G. Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rastenii. M., 1962. 378 s
Barthélémy D. Levels of organization and repetition phenomena in seeds plants // Acta Biotheoretica. 1991. Vol. 39. P. 309–323.
Bartelemy D., Grosfeld J., Bouroulet-Hallard F., Ducatillion C. Biology, growth and development // Cypress. A Practical Handbook. Florence, 1999. P. 27–34.
Bégin C., Filion L. Black spruce (Picea mariana) architecture // Can. J. Bot. 1999. Vol. 77. P. 664–672.
Beissner L., Fitschen J. Handbuch der Nadelholzkunde. Berlin, 1930. 765 S
Doak C.C. Evolution of foliar types, dwarf shoots, and cone scales of Pinus, with remarks concerning similar structures in related forms // Illinois biological monographs 1935. Vol. 13. Iss. 3. P. 7–95.
Earle C.J. The Gymnosperm Database. 2023 (http://www.conifers.org).
Eckenwalder J.E. Conifers of the World. The complete referens // Portland, London. 2009. 720 p.
Edelin C. Quelques aspects de l’architecture végétative des Conifères // Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. Lett. Botaniques. 1981. Vol. 128. N 3. P. 177–188.
Goebel K. von. Organographie der Pflanzen. 3 ed., parts 1–3. Jena. 1928–1931.
Grosfeld J. Arquitectura y dinámica de crecimiento de Araucaria araucana (Mol.) K. Koch (Araucariaceae): PhD Thesis. Comahue. 1994. 250 p.
Grosfeld J., Barthélémy D., Brion C. Architectural variations of Araucaria araucana (Molina) K. Koch (Araucariaceae) in its natural habitat / Kurmann M.H., Hemsley A.R. (Eds.), The Evolution of Plant Architecture. Royal Botanical Gardens. Kew, 1999. P. 109–122.
Hallé F., Oldeman R.A., Tomlinson P.B. Tropical Trees and Forests. Berlin, 1978. 441 p.
Laubenfels D.J. The external morphology of coniferous leaves // Phytomorphology. 1953. Vol. 3. P. 1–20.
Prevost M.F. Architecture del quelques Apocynacees ligneuses // Mem. Soc. Bot. Fr. 1967. Vol. 4. P. 24–36.
Sabatier S., Baradat P., Barthélémy D. 2003. Intra- and interspecific variations of polycyclism in young trees of Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti and Cedrus libani A. Rich (Pinaceae) // Annals of Forest. Science. Vol. 60. P. 19–29.
Tomlinson P.B. Crown structure in Araucariaceae // Available at website Proceedings of the International Dendrology Society 2003, Araucariaceae, Auckland. 16 pp.
Tomlinson P.B. Takaso T. Rattenbury J.A. Developmental shoot morphology in Phyllocladus (Podocarpaceae) // Bot. Journ. of the Linnean Society. 1989. Vol. 99. P. 223–248.
Troll W. Vergleichende Morphologie der hoheren Pfl anzen. Bd I. Vegetationsorgane. Teil I. Berlin. 1937. 955 S.
Veillon, J.-M. Architecture of the New Caledonian species of Araucaria / Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge. 1978. P. 233–245.
Veillon J.-M. Architecture des espèces néocalédoniennes du genre Araucaria // Candollea. 1980. Vol. 35. P. 609–640.

Список литературы

Antonova I.S., Azova O.V. Arkhitekturnye modeli krony drevesnykh rastenii // Bot. zhurn. 1999. T. 84. № 3. S. 10–32
Gatsuk L.E. Gemmaksilyarnye rasteniya i sistema sopodchinennykh edinits ikh pobegovogo tela // Byul. MOIP. Otd. Biol. 1974. T. 79. Vyp. 1. S. 100–113
Gatsuk L.E. Ierarkhicheskaya sistema strukturno-biologicheskikh edinits rastitel’nogo organizma, vydelennykh na makromorfologicheskom urovne // Uspekhi ekologicheskoi morfologii rastenii i ee vliyanie na smezhnye nauki. 1994. M., S. 18–19
Gatsuk L.E. Rastitel’nyi organizm: opyt postroeniya ierarkhicheskoi sistemy ego strukturno-biologicheskikh edinits. // «Sovremennye podkhody k opisaniyu struktury rastenii». 2008. Kirov. S. 26–47
Goroshkevich S.N. Struktura i razvitie elementarnogo pobega kedra sibirskogo // Vestn. Tomskogo gos. universiteta. Biol. 2014. T. 28. № 4. S. 37–55
Grudzinskaya I.A. Letnee pobegoobrazovanie u drevesnykh rastenii i ego klassifi katsiya. // Bot. zhurn. 1960. T. 45. № 7. S. 968–978
Kuznetsova T.V. K istorii razvitiya predstavlenii o plane stroeniya pobega sosudistykh rastenii i o meste filloma v nem // Bot. zhurn. 1995. T. 80. № 7. S. 1–11
Matyukhin D.L. Tipologiya vegetativnykh pobegov v klasse Pinopsida. // Izvestiya TSKhA. 2010. № 5. S. 46–56
Matyukhin, D.L. Sistemy elementarnykh monoritmicheskikh pobegov u khvoinykh. // Izvestiya TSKhA. 2012. № 1. S. 142–152
Meyen S.V. Gipoteza proiskhozhdeniya pokrytosemennykh ot bennettitov putem gamogeterotopii (perenosa priznakov s odnogo pola na drugoi). // Zhurn. obshch. biol. 1986. T. 47. № 3. S. 291–309
Meyen S.V. Osnovy paleobotaniki. M., 1987. 380 s
Mikhalevskaya O.B. Struktura i razvitie bokovykh sillepticheskikh pobegov u drevesnykh rastenii i predstavlenie ob elementarnom pobege. // «Aktual’nye voprosy ekologicheskoi morfologii rastenii». M., 1995. S. 70–76
Serebryakov I.G. Morfologiya vegetativnykh organov vysshikh rastenii. M., 1952. 391 s
Serebryakov I.G. Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rastenii. M., 1962. 378 s
Barthélémy D. Levels of organization and repetition phenomena in seeds plants // Acta Biotheoretica. 1991. Vol. 39. P. 309–323.
Bartelemy D., Grosfeld J., Bouroulet-Hallard F., Ducatillion C. Biology, growth and development // Cypress. A Practical Handbook. Florence, 1999. P. 27–34.
Bégin C., Filion L. Black spruce (Picea mariana) architecture // Can. J. Bot. 1999. Vol. 77. P. 664–672.
Beissner L., Fitschen J. Handbuch der Nadelholzkunde. Berlin, 1930. 765 S
Doak C.C. Evolution of foliar types, dwarf shoots, and cone scales of Pinus, with remarks concerning similar structures in related forms // Illinois biological monographs 1935. Vol. 13. Iss. 3. P. 7–95.
Earle C.J. The Gymnosperm Database. 2023 (http://www.conifers.org).
Eckenwalder J.E. Conifers of the World. The complete referens // Portland, London. 2009. 720 p.
Edelin C. Quelques aspects de l’architecture végétative des Conifères // Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. Lett. Botaniques. 1981. Vol. 128. N 3. P. 177–188.
Goebel K. von. Organographie der Pflanzen. 3 ed., parts 1–3. Jena. 1928–1931.
Grosfeld J. Arquitectura y dinámica de crecimiento de Araucaria araucana (Mol.) K. Koch (Araucariaceae): PhD Thesis. Comahue. 1994. 250 p.
Grosfeld J., Barthélémy D., Brion C. Architectural variations of Araucaria araucana (Molina) K. Koch (Araucariaceae) in its natural habitat / Kurmann M.H., Hemsley A.R. (Eds.), The Evolution of Plant Architecture. Royal Botanical Gardens. Kew, 1999. P. 109–122.
Hallé F., Oldeman R.A., Tomlinson P.B. Tropical Trees and Forests. Berlin, 1978. 441 p.
Laubenfels D.J. The external morphology of coniferous leaves // Phytomorphology. 1953. Vol. 3. P. 1–20.
Prevost M.F. Architecture del quelques Apocynacees ligneuses // Mem. Soc. Bot. Fr. 1967. Vol. 4. P. 24–36.
Sabatier S., Baradat P., Barthélémy D. 2003. Intra- and interspecific variations of polycyclism in young trees of Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti and Cedrus libani A. Rich (Pinaceae) // Annals of Forest. Science. Vol. 60. P. 19–29.
Tomlinson P.B. Crown structure in Araucariaceae // Available at website Proceedings of the International Dendrology Society 2003, Araucariaceae, Auckland. 16 pp.
Tomlinson P.B. Takaso T. Rattenbury J.A. Developmental shoot morphology in Phyllocladus (Podocarpaceae) // Bot. Journ. of the Linnean Society. 1989. Vol. 99. P. 223–248.
Troll W. Vergleichende Morphologie der hoheren Pfl anzen. Bd I. Vegetationsorgane. Teil I. Berlin. 1937. 955 S.
Veillon, J.-M. Architecture of the New Caledonian species of Araucaria / Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge. 1978. P. 233–245.
Veillon J.-M. Architecture des espèces néocalédoniennes du genre Araucaria // Candollea. 1980. Vol. 35. P. 609–640.